ETF Store Insight
Could 401k Fees Cut Your Investment Returns By a Third?
June 1st, 2012 by Nathan Geraci
That’s the conclusion from research group Demos, a multi-issue national organization who seeks to advocate change in various public matters. According to their research, a dual income household where each individual earns the median income and contributes to their 401k will pay an average of $154,794 in 401k fees and lost returns. For a higher income (defined as being in the top 25%) dual-earner household, Demos calculated the fees would run a staggering $277,969!
So, what’s driving these astronomical costs? Demos focused on two fees in particular:
- Expense Ratios on Funds – these are the fees that investors pay to fund companies to cover the management, marketing, and administration of the funds. For example, in Demos’ research, the median expense ratio of mutual funds in 401k plans was 1.27%.
- Trading Fees – these are the costs incurred by funds to buy and sell the securities that comprise the funds. Demos estimated these to run approximately 1.2%.
Demos included a nice chart depicting these fees (note that Demos uses a 7% return, the average long-term mutual fund return before fees according to their research):
What may be even scarier to 401k participants is that Demos’ research doesn’t even include all of the other expenses associated with the typical 401k plan – costs like plan record keeping fees and plan administrative fees. At The ETF Store, we’ve talked for years about the significant negative impact that fund fees can have on long-term investment performance. That’s why we use ETFs in our client portfolios. ETFs are typically far cheaper than actively managed mutual funds. And that’s not even factoring in the underperformance of actively managed mutual funds.
The ETF Store offers businesses an ETF-focused 401k platform that’s designed to reduce costs, increase transparency, and increase investment options within the plan – all of which can help employees become retirement ready. Asking hard working employees to sacrifice 30% of their investment returns so some overpaid money manager can buy a Porsche sounds egregious and unnecessary to us.